Talk:Jazz FM (UK)

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio: UK Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page is within the scope of the UK Radio taskforce. New members are always welcome!

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Jazz Low‑importance

	Jazz portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greater Manchester Mid‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

West Midlands Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Birmingham Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Birmingham, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Birmingham on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BirminghamWikipedia:WikiProject BirminghamTemplate:WikiProject BirminghamBirmingham articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Major objection to deletion

There is a potential problem here, jazzfm.com is not just a website but also a radio station which had a potential audience of 8 million people and a reach of hundreds of millions in Europe via satellite. If that isn't notable enough, then 80% of radio station articles on Wikipedia would also have to be deleted. There are thousands of radio stations in the UK which broadcast to a much lesser number of people. If the person deleting the article wishes to have a very large list of these stations to nominate for AfD, I can provide it. --tgheretford (talk) 09:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Jazz FM website is also the third top link provided on a google search for "jazz" --tgheretford (talk) 09:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully the point raised in the prod tag should now have been resolved. I have had to move the page back to Jazzfm.com from Jazz FM (website), because the station name is jazzfm.com (see WP:NAME). --tgheretford (talk) 18:28, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

September relaunch - title of article

With confirmation that the station will relaunch in September on a number of DAB multiplexes and on digital satellite television, I propose in accordance with relevant guidelines at WP:WPRS that the article name should change from jazzfm.com to Jazz FM (UK digital radio station), keeping the disambiguation in place. This change should only be done once Jazz FM relaunches. Objections or any better suggestions? --tgheretford (talk) 21:26, 2 July 2008 (UTC) [reply]

~~Okay, make that October 6th... still, any better article title suggestions? --tgheretford (talk) 08:39, 13 August 2008 (UTC)~~[reply]

I have come up with two ideas which override what I wrote above:

Move the current Jazz FM page to Jazz FM (disambiguation). Then move jazzfm.com to Jazz FM on October 6th (because it will be the most appropriate primary topic as per WP:DISAM) and add the following to the top of the page:

This would be the ideal solution, but if that is too long by consensus, we could use the following as a compromise:

As I wrote originally, keep everything as it is but rename jazzfm.com as Jazz FM (UK digital radio station).

I would now favour option 1. Anyone suggest anything better? --tgheretford (talk) 21:14, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case anyone reads this, another editor elsewhere suggested "Jazz FM (UK)", which I agree with (why do I never think of the obvious ones?). --tgheretford (talk) 13:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Jazz FM (UK). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:01, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jazz FM (UK). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718183128/http://www.radiotoday.co.uk/news.php?extend.3106.2 to http://www.radiotoday.co.uk/news.php?extend.3106.2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jazz FM (UK). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:12, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]